Archive for the ‘Management’ Category

The Lost Art of Customer Service

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010

In Stanley Kubrick’s 2001 A Space Odyssey, the nemesis of the movie was a computer called HAL. Its voice sounded exceptionally friendly and it made all the right noises and if it had possessed a face it would have been smiling inanely. Yet all the time it was trying to kill the humans it was meant to serve.

Call me cynical, maybe even a conspiracy theorist, but it seems that some companies have been able to replicate the essence of HAL and insert it into their “Customer Service Specialists”.

These people are not literally trying to kill you, of course, merely destroy your will to live whilst dealing with the company they represent. They speak in reassuring tones, nodding and smiling at everything you say, and then they hit you with their pre-programmed responses defined by the system within which they have been ordered to operate.

I think customers become annoyed because they believe the descriptions pinned to the lapels of these people. If you went into the bank with an enquiry and the counter clerk said to you: “Yes, you need to go and talk to the robot over there,” you would have little expectation of a favourable outcome because you would know the robot’s parameters were limited. Instead, you are actually informed that you should speak to the “customer service specialist”, and herein lies the misconception.

“Customer” – You

“Service” – Providing appropriate assistance

“Specialist” – Highly trained

Put all those together and you naturally believe that this person will be able to listen to your particular request or gripe and then use their knowledge and most importantly, their discretion, to tailor a personalised solution.

A human should be able to do this, but not when they are working within strictly imposed company guidelines. When you remove the option of discretion, you often also remove the entire concept of customer service and you effectively end up with a robot. You can almost see the confusion behind their smiling eyes.

We are not talking about complex customer requests here. The other day, I asked my bank (the Commonwealth) if they could split my personal credit card limit, and allot one half to a new business credit card.

Apparently this was impossible!

The only solution was that I would have to stand around and wait for someone to carry out the necessary paperwork to apply for a new card.  And I mean stand around, as there were no chairs.

I asked why this person couldn’t just take all the details the bank already had about me, complete the form and send it to me for signing, but this data option was not pre-programmed into my CBA “customer service specialist”. I left!

Later when I called to offer feedback, I was informed that what I had asked could have been carried out, but that it wasn’t company policy. This person further admitted that it would have been within the realms of possibility to direct my backside towards a chair whilst I waited. Obviously, because robots do not have muscles that tire, they cannot grasp the human need to take the weight off.

In reality, to blame the individual “customer service specialist” is a little harsh. The real problem is with the management who do not allow the human factor to come into play with their customer-facing staff. The only genuine reason why this might be good business practice is if the people they are employing are not very bright and cannot be trusted to think for themselves lest they make a reckless decision that triggers a whole host of problems.

If this fear is preponderant, then they should pay higher wages to attract brighter employees. The payoff would be a much happier clientele, and increased revenue through an enhanced customer service reputation.

Fortunately, some companies do get the point. I have experienced quality customer service on a couple of occasions recently, where the specialist really deserved their title. Then again, all they had to do was listen to what was being said, and possess the freedom to act unilaterally to resolve the issue.

It is a sad reflection of the state of play, however, that when you have such a positive experience with customer service personnel, you’re left feeling that something strange has just happened.

Companies need to give their employees the opportunity to provide the best customer service where it matters – on the ground with the customer. They have to be given the go-ahead to become human again, and to stop behaving like robots.

PS The partly completed form arrived in the mail a couple of days after my “feedback” and after I had arranged a business card somewhere else!

Lessons from Lara

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

Bang, clink. What was that? That was the sound of Lara Bungle – sorry, Bingle – shooting herself in the foot just before her engagement rings falls to the floor. It’s fair to say that this woman is not about to set herself up as a business guru any time soon.

Okay, maybe her career had slowed, but she had a fiance and 4.7 carats on her finger and a $6 million Bondi apartment she shared with her now ex-fiance according to latest news reports.

It all started with the publication of a photo of her taken whilst she was in the shower by her ex, AFL footballer/knuckle-scraper Brendan Fevola. He allegedly  released the pic to his mates (as you do) and it ended up in a magazine. Bingle became a victim and garnered considerable sympathy. She said she would sue Fevola, and no one blamed her for that.

Then celebrity publicist Max Markson rode into town and swept her up and away from Sympathy straight into Desolation. Instead of building on the sympathy vote, his representation has managed to turn the entire country against her, which is perhaps not the marketing solution she had hoped for. Having announced that he would transform her into a $1 million multimedia package, even talking about a spin-off reality television show, Markson managed to secure a reported $200,000 for a tell-all interview for Bingle with Woman’s Day magazine. If the intention was to create even more sympathy regarding the boorish behaviour of Fevola, it didn’t quite pan out that way. Seen as cashing in, Miss Bingle instantly lost her victim status.

Not the desired marketing solution

For one thing, Bingle is throwing stones at Fevola from inside her own glass house, which is never a good personal marketing strategy. She should have remembered that she was seen as a marriage-wrecker at the time, as Fevola was not single. She might also have paused to assess the current view of her, which from some angles is that she is a money-obsessed WAG to her ex fiance Michael Clarke, cruising around in an Aston Martin whilst sporting an engagement ring that cost half the price of an average Aussie house.

It’s also been noted that Clarke’s cricketing career has not been helped by their relationship; in fact, according to the media he has been told by cricketing officials that if he doesn’t sort his head out very soon, he won’t be playing Test cricket any more.

In New Zealand at the time, Clarke had stern words with Bingle following the magazine story and Bingle was then seen leaving their Bondi pad and heading off to stay with friend and DJ Carl Kennedy. Clarke then left his Australian teammates and returned to Sydney to an empty home, although Clarke’s agent, Chris White, has denied that the marriage is off.

The other problem Bingle has to contend with, apart from being susceptible to bad advice, being happy in adulterous relationships, and being a blatant WAG, is that she doesn’t seem to be too bright, even for a 22 year old. Whilst this can win the “aahh bless” vote from some people, it can become very irritating when practiced as an art.

Case in point: when she became the face of the “Where the Bloody Hell Are You” campaign, The Daily Telegraph asked her how she felt about being a Cronulla girl projecting a positive image of Australia just months after the race riots that so badly marred the Sydney suburb. Instead of actually knowing about the riots, or even pretending to – given that they had been stated as a fact by the journalist – she chose to admit that she had been modelling underwear in Italy and was not aware that any riots had taken place. In other words, she didn’t keep up with the news and none of her friends considered it important enough to mention to her, which either says something about their priorities, or reveals that they don’t think the presentation of such facts, or conversations of that sort, are worth bothering with where Bingle is concerned. Much as you wouldn’t waste your breath giving a seminar on grammar and syntax to George Bush.

As for Markson, on second thoughts, perhaps he’s actually more of a business strategist than we give him credit for – except that his eye is on his own business rather than his clients’. If Bingle did receive $200,000 for her story, he’s likely to have earned over 10% of that for himself.

In Bingle’s defence, celebrities shouldn’t really have to ask whether the publicity that their publicist is planning is likely to screw their career; it should be taken as read that publicity is intended to prolong a career and provoke a positive public response.

Batt fiasco is PM’s fault

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

This is one of the best articles I have read about current politics in Australia. Congratulations to the Herald Sun.

China: The Distinction Between Power and Greatness

Friday, February 12th, 2010

Why should Australian business care about the direction China’s economy takes? Why should we care if the Chinese are buying U.S. debt by the bucketful? Why should we care about the new trade sanctions put in place January 1, 2010 by the U.S. on Chinese goods?

What does all of this have to do with small business in our country? Well, China is one of Australia’s most important trading partners. That affects the Australian economy in ways we have yet to imagine.

So, over the past few weeks I’ve been researching business activities in China – everything from lending policies, a growing middle class and expanding base of manufacture.

My conclusions? Indeed, China is a powerful country and a major player on the world economic stage. But it is not a great country.

In effect, the Chinese sabotaged the climate change talks in Copenhagen at the end of the 2009. Of course, this summit of world leaders and scientists had little teeth to begin with, serving in an “advisory” capacity to world governments.

China, a country that tops the list of polluters – pumping even more filth into the atmosphere than the U.S. – refused to budge on their pollution control policies. Why? Well, China simply doesn’t have to play ball with the Western nations. It’s that powerful a force in the world economy which, as small business owners, we recognise as having a direct impact on our business.

Need a new product fabricated and manufactured? Chances are, you won’t use an Australian-based fabricator when you can get the same job done in China at half the price. Long live our great nation, but business is, well, business. National pride often takes a back seat when it comes to the cold, hard realities of global economics.

No one questions China is a powerful nation. Its holster is jam-packed with nuclear weapons – enough to annihilate the world. It has an almost endless supply of cheap labour to develop a powerful manufacturing base. It has a government that encourages a little bit of private, albeit, highly regulated private ownership. China is slowly marching in to the new millennium in some ways.

In other ways, China remains a repressive regime, strongly centralized and tradition bound.

What defines greatness?

Read the article at http://strategies.com.au/art1002a.html

Why Obama Got It Wrong!

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

Holidays give me time to do some thinking and a little crystal ball gazing.

Like you, I’m a small business owner and a service provider. Most of my clients are small business owners, but Obamanomics will impact us all regardless of company size, manufacturer or service provider.

Like it or not the American consumer drives the world economy. They buy stuff that keeps factories in China running 24/7. Clothes, computers, large-screen TVs – all made off American shores, mostly in Asia. The trade deficit between the U.S. and China has always been lop-sided, and now, the U.S. owes the Chinese government two trillion dollars. A child born in the U.S. today OWES approximately $36,540 at birth!

The U.S. has become a debtor nation, in effect, the world’s largest banana republic.

And this has thinking Americans worried. U.S unemployment is running at around 10%. Unlike us Aussie spenders, America has become a nation of scrimpers and savers, not buyers. Many are running scared, afraid of losing their jobs. Every American knows someone who’s been laid off or down-sized and that has a sobering effect on the buying, spending and saving habits of the largest consumer society in the world.

(Were it not for the Rudd socialist stimulus packages I suspect I would be writing this about Australia. But that article will come later this year after more interest rate rises and those holiday spending credit card bills hit home.)

Where Obama Went Wrong

Read the article here

2010: Trends and Opportunities

Friday, December 18th, 2009

The Chinese proverb “We live in interesting times” must surely be one of the most apt for what lies ahead for Australia for 2010. In a world wracked by the Global Financial Crisis in economic and in social terms, Australian business leaders and managers can look forward to building on the green shoots of recovery that have emerged since mid year.

‘Encouraging’ rather than ‘interesting’ comes to mind if one looks at the most recent statistic and commentary posted by both government and Treasury officials in the Australian scene.

Read the Article here

Time to Plan

Sunday, December 6th, 2009

As the first decade of the second millennium comes to a close, many businesses look back with a sense of amazement.  In the past five years we’ve never seen so many spectacular profits, nor such unimaginable losses.

It would be nice to just coast into 2010 thankful to have survived. However, those who succeed in the second decade must not relax, but plan. You must take the time to plan what your business will look like in the coming year, the next three years and the next five years.

Twelve months to Recovery

Your initial plan should be only twelve months long, but it must be comprehensive. Look at all aspects of your business. Do you have the number of employees you need and are they performing the job that your require? Consider if you would benefit from a renegotiation with your suppliers. Develop a plan to keep your current customers happy and get new ones. Create a calendar of speeches, articles and appearances to keep your businesses name in the forefront of the market.  Write down the advantages and disadvantages you have against your competition and combat them. Take a fresh look at your offices and consider how to update and refresh them. The last month of the decade is not a time to look back, but a time to look forward.

Five years will seem like a dream

Five years from now we’ll all look back on this year’s recession and say, “I remember when…”. Can you imagine what your business will look like in five years?  What do you want it to look like? Be honest. Is your goal survival or growth?  How will you get there? How many employees will you need?  Will you need more space?  Less?  What will your technological requirements be? How will you finance your plans? Perhaps retirement is in your plan or you have children to put through university.

What has to happen to your business to make your personal goals happen? If your business is still successful, will you continue in it, or sell? How much involvement do you want to have in your business at that point in your life?  Do you still want to be hands-on in every detail, or could you restructure your business to allow more time for fishing? It’s never too soon to think long term.

While everyone else has a holiday focus it’s a great time to plan.


“Executives Don’t Talk to Customers at Hertz”

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009

My Qantas flight landed on time so off I headed, confirmation and No 1 Club 5 Star member card in hand, to the Hertz Gold Service counter at Melbourne Airport.

The bay number after my name read an ominous “see office”.

At the office I learned that my car, which was booked for 10:00 am (and it was now 11:05 am) was not ready.

The station manager fussed about and said he could get me a car soon (and he did) and I was on my way in a somewhat lower class of car than ordered. An hour later I noticed that I had still be charged for the higher class of car so I phoned Hertz.

After waiting in one of those “we value your business so we have placed you in a queue” queues I tried calling the head office switchboard and asked to speak to Jacqui Lehmann-Vogel, the Hertz Manager in Australia. The receptionist, Annie, (who refused to tell me her name) told me in no uncertain terms that Ms Lehmann-Vogel does not take calls from customers – they have to be directed to the customer service department. When I queried her she said “our executives don’t talk to customers”.

Well eventually I got through to a customer service representative who did all the usuals – reduced the rate, provided a credit, said I could exchange the car at the City office for the type confirmed and offered to send me a free one-day rental certificate as compensation. All wonderful, but I had to take my time to go and change cars and my time to call them several times before I got through.

Yes, I saved a few dollars (which is frankly irrelevant in a business situation) but what I remember is “Executives Don’t Talk to Customers at Hertz”.

Maybe Hertz should find some executives who do talk to customers. Or even train their airport staff how to deal with service recovery (when something goes wrong – not after the customer has had time to become even more upset).

It’s a lesson for us all.

Can Do to No Can Do

Monday, June 1st, 2009

There’s no industry that demands customer service more than the hospitality industry — hotels, restaurants and related sectors. The kinds of experiences customers have in hospitality determine whether they will frequent the establishment again, and, even more importantly, whether they will recommend it to their friends and colleagues. It is a brutal fact of life that in business, we are more inclined to tell of a horror story than a feel-good one.

A sad anecdote

Consider this customer services experience: This week I stayed at a 5-star, branded hotel and noticed how otherwise smaller things had become too much trouble for customer service staff. In the Executive Lounge I asked for a Diet Coke at 5.15 pm and was told “we don’t start serving guests until 5.30 pm.” When I explained that my mini-bar had not been restocked the person reluctantly got the drink.

The mere fact that I am telling you this is worrying. There seems to be an increasing tendency to short-cut on service delivery.

A ‘can do’ attitude will create a positive customer experience; a ‘no can do’ attitude will sullen the experience and result in a totally different word-of moth message. Clearly the above story had nothing to do with resources at hand (the good were there, as were the staff) but all to do with mindset and training.

Recession response

Some businesses – especially those that rely on discretionary spending – cut back on staff as a first response to a loss or threatened loss of revenue. For sure a business must “right size” itself but there is more work to be done before customer service levels are compromised.

One specialised Sydney based furniture retailer, rather than cut back staff, took them to a sales seminar which had a strong customer service training element. The proprietor said that she built her business on giving superb customer service knowing that this brought referrals.

In a recession the word of mouth channel becomes the critical revenue generator as new revenue dollars would be hard to justify.

The idea that cutting back staff in order to maintain margins does not cut it in a service oriented industry. As the store proprietor said, “The recession gives me the opportunity to buy stock well (at hefty discounts) and thus maintain my margins. I didn’t need to cut back staff.”

Illustration

Staying with the hospitality industry gives us further insights to ‘can do’ and ‘no can do’ mindsets. Have you ever wondered why some restaurants have a loyal customer following while others limp along? The answer is not in the ambiance or even in the quality of food. Today, those are taken for granted — every “good” restaurant is expected to have these. The difference between restaurants that build a loyal following and those that don’t is all in customer service. That special ‘can do’ attitude that permeates all the best establishments.

You know it at the very first interaction with the staff. The ‘can do’, successful restaurant will resonate from the moment you enter the place. An impression is made that either enhances or detracts from the experience. Successful establishments recognize the importance of customer service and spend time training their staff on exactly how to work with customers. They will not put at risk customer loyalty through a lack of delivery of a ‘can do’, high level customer service.

The TV series Faulty Towers had the bumbling Basil (a “manager”) always speaking before he thought. Is it not basic that Customer Service 101 would be to think before you speak? Consider the impact of your words on the customer or client and how they might be interpreted. If you want your clients or customers to a have a memorable experience or to genuinely experience your service as “above expectations” then you need to be sure to think about the words you use – at all times.

What customers take away when they leave a restaurant is an overall impression of the quality of the experience. That’s why it’s important to pay attention to the total customer experience.

Final thoughts

Finding new customers is much more expensive than retaining existing ones. Cost saving expeditions would do well to discover that customer service is too valuable a function to put in the “items to be cut” list.  Customer service is more than just keeping customers happy.  It’s about revenue, because a lost customer means lost revenue and an unhappy customer can damage your reputation.

Some aspects of effective customer service are:

  • knowing your customers’ needs;
  • identifying your key service activities;
  • delivering superior service;
  • follow-up.

Oh, and don’t think this just applies to hospitality.

Hotels – what do you expect?

Sunday, May 17th, 2009

As a consultant and professional presenter I spend about 100 nights a year in hotels.

In fact, in the last two weeks I have spent 11 nights away from home. Most of the hotels have been great but every so often something goes wrong. That’s when you find out just how well the staff are trained.

What I look for is:

  • Fast check-in
  • A clean room with everything working
  • A comfortable bed
  • A hot shower with good pressure, and
  • Fast check-out

I am seldom in the room so I don’t care about the view.

Oh, and it’s nice to have a general manager who is actually available if there is an issue.

What do you look for in a hotel?